As first reported by Monsey Scoop, a petition to dissolve the Village of Spring Valley was recently filed by a group of individuals, some of whom reportedly do not reside within the village. The petition included approximately 2,685 signatures—well above the 10% threshold seemingly required under New York State law. However, following a detailed review, the Village Clerk has officially rejected the petition, concluding that it failed to meet the legal requirement of valid signatures from 10% of registered voters living within the village.
According to law, the petitioners were required to submit signatures from at least 10% of the registered voters who reside within the Village of Spring Valley. With approximately 13,000 registered voters in the village, this means the threshold stood at around 1,300 valid signatures. Despite the petition containing more than double that number, the Clerk found that many of the individuals who signed do not actually live within the village boundaries or are not registered voters. One of the major sources of confusion stems from the fact that multiple municipalities—including Chestnut Ridge, New Square, New Hempstead, and parts of Wesley Hills—share the same Spring Valley, NY 10977 mailing address. As a result, many people mistakenly believe that they reside in the Village of Spring Valley simply because their address says “Spring Valley.”
The Clerk conducted a thorough examination of each petition sheet and cross-checked the signatures against voter registration rolls and village boundaries. After more than a week of review, it was determined that the number of valid signatures fell short of the 1,300 required, and the Clerk made the decision to reject the petition. It’s important to note that under New York State law, the Village Clerk has the sole authority to accept or reject such petitions, and her determination is binding unless overturned by a court.
Legal experts anticipate that the petitioners will likely file an Article 78 proceeding—a legal challenge asking a judge to review the Clerk’s decision. If the case proceeds, both sides will present arguments: the petitioners will argue that they met the threshold, while the Clerk will defend her findings and explain why she believes the petition failed to comply with legal standards. Ultimately, the court will decide whether the Clerk acted within her authority or if the petition must be accepted and the matter advanced to a public vote.
As of now, the referendum to dissolve the Village of Spring Valley will not appear on the November ballot. However, the situation is far from over, and a courtroom battle now appears imminent.
Monsey Scoop will continue to follow developments closely and provide updates as they unfold.

Welcome to the spring valley corruption!!!
I do lot live in Spring Valley or even in New York. This is really a very simple issue. Let everyone sot together and examine each and every signature one by one. As soon as the required 1300 signatures are reached, the petition can go ahead. If that number is not reached, the petition fails. This really is not rocket science.
I’ve seen the signatures there is about 1600 verified ones, it’s public records,
where can i find this public record ?
and did you check each and every single signature to see if they are registered voters ?
maybe only 900 are valid signatures who tells you 1600 are good?
Request it from the askunim taking care of it.
What a crazy village how are they not scared of a lawsuit!!!
Now we understand even better why we have to dissolve the village
What a coincidence.
SV clerk should review petitions that will eliminate her job, lol
@ SV resident.
I hope you understand that if the Village will defferd the lawsuit it will be used from tax payers money as well.
So if the petitioners will file an article 78 then they will make the Village spend tax payers money.
So basically the taxes will go up because the village will need more money to fight in court
But iyh it’s all temporary let’s hope that in about 2 years the village will be History
@Sloimy G.
That’s the law….
They don’t always follow the law unfortunately, the FBI was more then onse in the village
און אנדערע חברה האבן גע’יושבט וכו’ סא פוק חזי.. לצערינו הרב
A git voch to everyone
The petitions is public so unless you’re blind there is no way to say they there is not enough verified signatures,it’s just that the village is trying there luck and fighting for there exists, but unfortunately there big losers because when everyone sees the verified signatures they just get more upset on the village and will fight back the big curuption
time will talk…
@yoely l
where can i find this public record ?
and did you check each and every single signature to see if they are registered voters ?
maybe only 900 are valid signatures who tells you 1600 are good?
💯 present confident that they have enough good signatures
It just shows how stupid the village is behaving, they have to face reality that “DISSOLVING SV IS GOING TO BE A FACT”
Hey everyone, I saw all the signatures. You can request it from the people who took care of it. its a pitty to the trustees what a chilull hashem because they have an agenda… It’s not right to take the voice of”The People” and just deny it
The 2-3 village developers and builders are fighting it too.
See the chat on ivelt
https://www.ivelt.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=76951&hilit=%D7%95%D7%95%D7%99%D7%9C%D7%99%D7%93%D7%96%D7%A9&start=125
Guys the village is trying there best for years but unfortunately the failed to fix and deliver what needed therefore myself and my friends want to dissolve the village,
It is emotional connected to our hearts but sometimes you gotta use the brain and not the feelings,